CPQ Microbiology (2018) 1:6
Research Article

Pegylated Interferon (PEG-INF) Plus Ribavirin Response in Patients with HCV Genotype-3 in Hyderabad, Sindh


Shahzad Rasheed Qureshi1,2*, Allah Bux Ghanghro1, Muhammad Sadik Memon2, Naila Shaikh3, Ali Muhammad Waryah4 & Nazakat Hussain Memon5*

1Institute of Biochemistry University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
2Asian Institute of Medical Science Hyderabad, Pakistan
3Departments of Pathology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
4Molecular Biology & Genetics Department Medical Research Center, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
5Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, China

*Correspondence to: Shahzad Rasheed Qureshi, Institute of Biochemistry University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan. Tel: +92-333-2 684982, E-Mail: dna_science@hotmail.com & Dr. Nazakat Hussain Memon, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, China. Tel: +92-300-8931877, E-Mail: nazakat31@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2018 Dr. Shahzad Rasheed Qureshi, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 30 October 2018
Published: 06 November 2018

Keywords: HCV; Pegylated Interferon (PEG-INF) and Ribavirin, Genotype 3


Abstract

Objective
To determine the virological response after Pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and Ribavirin therapy. To monitor the response Hepatitis C by HCV viral load RT-PCR in chronic HCV patients’ genotype 3 in the different intervals of Rapid virologic response (RVR) and Sustained Virologic Response (SVR).

Material and Methods
All anti HCV antibody positive subjects, aged >18 years male and female were enrolled in the study from the Gastroenterology department Asian Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Hyderabad and Gastro-wards at Isra University Hospital Hala road Hyderabad. Quantification of HCV RNA was done by the techniques of target amplification. HCV genotype was done by Abbott Real Time HCV Genotype II assay “Abbott Molecular, USA”. The patients were treated with combination of Pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and Ribavirin, in the course of 4 weeks treatment to achieve the RVR and further 24 weeks to achieve the SVR. All the data was recorded in the proforma.

Results
Total 200 patients were includes males 54% and females 46% with mean age of 36.0±12.0 years. Majority of patients 114(57.0%) exhibited level of viral load >500000 IU/mL, while 86(43.0%) patients revealed <500000 IU/ml. RVR was achieved by 61% of the patients, while (SVR) was achieved by 83% of the patients following by the 4 weeks and 24 weeks of therapy respectively. Viral load >500000IU/ml showed significant impact on RVR p-value 0.009.SVR was achieved within 83%, particularly as 25.6% having viral load >500000IU/ml and 30.7% having viral load <500000IU/ml, on the basis of these findings higher viral load had negative significant impact on viral load achievement p-value 0.003.

Conclusion
It is concluded that Pegylated Interferon (PEG-INF) plus Ribavirin has tremendous response in patients with HCV genotype-3.Viral load >500000 IU/ml and <500000 IU/ml showed were significant impact.

Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a worldwide public health challenge, projected that 71,000,000 individuals are infected with chronic Hepatitis C virus (CHCV). Infection having significant risk of acquiring advanced hepatic disease, as cirrhosis and carcinoma [1]. An increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by 17-times in chronic hepatitis C patients compared to their corresponding individuals, who are HCV-negative and this can possibly persist even after establishing a therapy-provoked sustained virological response (SVR) [2-5]. Untreated around 399 000 individuals died of consequences correlated with HCV, predominantly of advanced hepatic disease and HCC, yearly [6-9]. As a concern, Hepatitis C is the commonest indication for hepatic transplantation within developed nations [10]. For above 20 years, interferon has been a source for the treatment of HCV, responses was enhanced during 1998 via Ribavirin addition and then during 2001-2002 via joining the interferon molecule to polyethylene glycol (PEG) [11-13]. In recent time major advances have been made in the treatment of hepatitis C with licensing of 1st direct acting antivirals and several proceeding trials with different direct acting antiviral sex habiting advantageous tolerability profile, high potency, decreases induration of treatment higher reduction to resistance and all oral procedures [14]. Though, yet no vaccine is accessible.

HCV exposed during 1989[15], as a single stranded RNA virus of the Flavivaridae family, which as well includes several human pathogens of Flavivirus genus that are transmitted by arthropods such as yellow dengue virus, West Nile virus and fever virus. Isolates of HCV have been categorized into 7 genotypes and several subtypes [16] having distinct geographical allocations and sensitivity to treatment based on interferon [17-18]. Pakistan is an under developed nation of 170,000,000 individuals with low educational and health standards. Within Pakistan 10,000,000 individuals are assumed to be contaminated by HCV [19]. Public wellbeing authorities are establishing awareness regarding hepatitis via electronic and print media [20]. However, still remarkable endeavors are needed to elevate the consciousness of several risk factors concerning the transmission of HCV. The WHO has instituted an international standard to universally standardize HCV RNA quantification unit’s defined international unit currently applied in every commercial quantitative assays of HCV RNA. In “real-time” PCR, every round of amplification results in a fluorescent signal emission and total signals per cycle are proportional to HCV RNA quantity in the starting specimen. Assays of qualitative detection defined the presence of HCV either present or not in blood stream. We aimed in current study, to assess the efficacy of Pegylated interferon plus Ribavirin (PEG-INF) treatment monitoring via HCV viral load by RT-PCR among CHCV patients’ genotype 3 via molecular analysis in the course of Ribavirin plus Pegylated interferon treatment in term of RVR and SVR.

Materials and Methods
The study was conduct at Institute of Biochemistry, University of Sindh. All anti HCV antibody positive subjects, aged above 18 years with both male and female genders were enrolled in the study from the gastroenterology department Asian Institute of Medical Sciences(AIMS) Hyderabad and gastro-wards at Isra University Hospital Hala road Hyderabad. The HCV RNA positive patients (n=200) were considered for genotyping. Samples of Venus blood were aseptically collected for genotyping in 2 yellow-top geltubes. 3ml of blood was isolatedin the course of one hour and then stored at -70C to be used as one-time batchanalysis.

Target Amplification and RNA Extraction
Viral RNA was isolated from the plasma of patient’s by QIAamp Viral RNA mini kit as per the instructions of manufacturer. A positive sample (positive extraction) and two negative samples (negative extraction) were taken in every batch for assessing the efficiency of extractions.

HCV RNA Quantification
Quantification of HCV RNA was done by the techniques of target amplification and the Artus HCV kit amplifies a 240 bp region of 5 UTR HCV genome with the detection directly to specific amplicon in Rotor- Gene Q fluorescence channel Cycling Green. Heterologous internal control is as well amplified for checking potential PCR inhibition and it is detected in the fluorescence channel Cycling Orange of the Rotor-Gene Q. For detection of Artus HCV QS-RGQ, lower limit is 36.2IU/ml, whereas the linear range is 67.6 IU/ ml. The assay obtained in recent times the Conformity European- in Vitro “Diagnostic Medical Devices approval”.

HCV Genotyping
Determination of HCV genotype was done by Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay “Abbott Molecular, USA”. This assay targets 5-UTR region that is higher preserved in HCV genotypes, and NS5B gene for efficient distinction between HCV subtypes 1b and 1a.The assay employs three reaction blends with HCV oligo - nucleotide probes bound to three distinct reporter dyes (NED, VIC, and FAM) and a 4th dye (Quasar 670) allocated to pumpkin gene, a heterologous internal control. This pattern lets a precise distinction of HCV type’s I–VI and subtypes 1a, 1b “Ciotti et al., 2010”.

Statistical Analysis
The Analysis of data was done by SPSS-22.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, US). Descriptive statistics was applied for summarizing the categorical and continuous data. Results were exhibited as percentages, frequencies, and mean ± standard deviation.

Results
The demographic, virological and clinical features of the patients are enlisted in Table 1. The regimens of treatment were relatively heterogeneous, even though the patients were managed with a combination of Ribavirin and Peg-IFN therapy. Total 200 patients were treated in the course of 4 weeks (RVR) and finally 24 weeks (SVR). The gender distribution exhibited male 54% and female 46%. At the beginning of treatment, every patient was positive for both of the parameters. Mean of ATL was 61.23±45.22IU/L. The HCV-RNA baseline values varied from >500000IU/ml and <500000IU/ml. The levels distribution exhibited that majority of patients (114/200; 57.0%) exhibited levels above 500000 IU/mL, while 86 of the 200 patients (43.0%) revealed values below 500000IU/ml. Moreover, there were no significant differences between male and female in whole study population. [Table.1A &B]

Table 1A: Baseline Characteristics Patients, n=200


Table 1B: Sustained virological response of HCV patient’s genotype 3 by gender wise: n=200


As expected, the reduction in HCV-RNA in the course of therapy was much rapid since the negativity rates for HCV-RNA, and (RVR) achieved by 61% of the patients, while (SVR) was achieved by 83% of the patients following by the 4 weeks and 24 weeks of therapy respectively. Subjects having lower HCV viral showed good response to treatment as compare those having HCV viral load above 500000IU/ml. [Fig.1] Subjects having lower HCV viral showed good response to treatment as compare those having HCV viral load above 500000IU/ml.


Figure 1: Pegylated interferon response in RVR and SVR N=200

Viral load >500000IU/ml showed significant impact on RVR, as majority of the 61 showed RVR out of 86 cases presented with viral load <500000 IU/ml, while 61 cases showed RVR out of 114 those had viral load >500000IU/ml, p-value 0.009 [Table:2]

Table 2: Impact of viral load >500000 IU/ml and <500000IU/ml on (rapid virological response)n=200


SVR was achieved within 83% out of the 200 cases, particularly as 25.6% having viral load >500000IU/ml and 30.7% having viral load <500000IU/ml, on the basis of these findings higher viral load had negative significant impact on viral load achievement p-value 0.003. [Table:3]

Table 3: Sustained virological response impact of viral load >500000IU/ml and <500000IU/ml on HCV genotype 3 patients n=200


Discussion
Incidence of Hepatitis C patients is high globally and rapidly elevating in Pakistan. Compulsory screening for blood donors and growing screening trend for the patient’s prior to dental and surgical procedures as well unawareness of diseases is contributing significantly in uncovering fresh cases of Hepatitis C. Genotype 3 was dominant in this series. In this study males were 54% and 46% females. While in the study of Sandoughdaran S et al [21] reported that males were 81.1% and females 19.9% these are in the favour in our findings but a big difference in gender as compare to this study.

Genotype 3 is a poorly understood and the most underrated type of HCV. For years, we considered genotype-3 as good with favourable interferon therapy outcome. However, most Asian studies have exhibited lower SVR contrasted to western data, Shahid Sarwar et al [22] noted 72.1%, Batool et al [23] noted 68% and Waheed yaser et al [24] observed 58%-75% response rate in genotype 3 while some higher response was also occurred Iqbal S et al [25] showed SVR 89.23% and ETR 81.5% HCV genotype 3patients.However, it was 72% in a study from Lahore consisting of 721 cases [26]. Niederau C et al. established that genotype 3 patients have further hepatic fibrosis and just 56.9% of them were responsive to interferon treatment [27]. In our study, SVR of 72.1% patients supports the other documented studies [28]. It is distressing to perceive that fresh evolving directly acting drugs with assurance of interferon free therapy of HCV are documented to be not much effective in genotype 3 [29]. Effect of genotype-III on the resistance of insulin and the metabolism of lipids is assumed to be a factor accountable for poor treatment response of it [30].

To address this problem of insufficient response, response directed treatment was introduced. RVR, is directly correlated with viral clearance [31], also noticed in present study. In present study SVR in HCV genotype 3 patients was 56.4% and overall SVR response 83% and non-responders were 17% while RVR was 61% statistically significant. It has been reported earlier Fried MW et al noticed that subjects with RVR are superior SVR between 88 and100% across all genotypes [32], however SVR in cases without RVR is lower, 45% documented by Shiffman ML [33], and 56% in the study of Dalgard O [34], with 24 week therapy. These results confirmed the protective role of Pegylated interferon response because of small number of HCV genotype 3 patients. In the latest study November 2016 on 288Myanmar HCV patients genotype 1,2,3, and 6 treated with Peg-IFN alpha 2a-2b and RBV observed SVR 82% overall in population of Myanmar [35] has been similar as present study associated with the protective role and brilliant response of therapy in HCV patients.

We investigated significantly achieved RVR and SVR (61%), P=.009 and 166(83%), P= .003) during Peg IFN and RBV therapy. This is in agreement of previous study described HCV with thalassemic patients achieved (72.2% and 77.8% having a only significant factor that correlated with SVR in thalassemic cases. Our study gives rise to the challenges of acceptability and compliance of importance of therapy among cases. Only 17% of cases, requiring extended treatment, continued therapy beyond 6 months. Regardless of, approving RGT plan at the treatment initiation, most patients denied treatment extension because of therapy associated side effects.

Response directed interferon treatment can marginally improve the interferon treatment response as noted in this study, however because of insignificant compliance of the prolonged treatment, number of cases on Peg-IFN and RBV were limited, there is needed of big case control studies to establish better outcomes. As prohibitively higher price of DAAs, and non-affordable for the most of our populace; it is thus, prudent to additionally explore another option Peg IFN and RBV to treat cases with HCV in Pakistan.

Conclusion
It is concluded that Pegylated Interferon (PEG-INF) plus Ribavirin has excellent response in patients with HCV genotype-3. Viral load >500000IU/ml and <500000IU/ml showed significant impact on RVR and SVR as compare to. No significance has achieved in male and female patients. Treatment planning should be upgrade to achieve the RVR and SVR in patients with higher viral load.

Conflict of Interest: None

Acknowledgments
I am grateful to my Ph.D supervisor Professor Dr. Allah Bux Ghanghro at Institute of Biochemistry University of Sindh. He guide and support for compilation of this work, and I also thanks to Professor Dr. Muhammad Sadik Memon. He fully cooperate me in collection of patient’s samples, and also thanks to patients who are agreed to participate in this study.

Bibliography

  1. W.H.O. (2017). Global Hepatitis Report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. de Oliveria Andrade, L.J., et al. (2009). Association between hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 1(1), 33-37.
  3. Goossens, N. & Hoshida, Y. (2015). Hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, 21(2), 105-114.
  4. Conti, F., et al. (2016). Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. Journal of Hepatology, 65(4), 727-733.
  5. El‐Serag, H. B., et al. (2016). Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virological response in Veterans with hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology, 64(1), 130-137.
  6. W.H.O. (2015). Hepatitis C: fact sheet no. 164.
  7. W.H.O. (2000). Hepatitis C. Fact Sheet No. 164. WHO web site, 2008.
  8. Grebely, J., et al. (2011). Impact of hepatitis C virus infection on all‐cause and liver‐related mortality in a large community‐based cohort of inner city residents. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 18(1), 32-41.
  9. Kielland, K.B., et al. (2013). All-cause and liver-related mortality in hepatitis C infected drug users followed for 33 years: a controlled study. Journal of Hepatology, 58(1), 31-37.
  10. Thomas, D. L. (2013). Global control of hepatitis C: where challenge meets opportunity. Nature Medicine, 19(7), 850-858.
  11. Mannis, M., McHutchison, J., et al. (2001). Peginterferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: results of a randomized trial. Lancet, 358(9286), 263.
  12. McHutchison, J.G., et al. (1998). Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(21), 1485-1492.
  13. Fried, M.W., et al. (2002). Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(13), 975-982.
  14. Pawlotsky, J.M. (2014). New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges. Gastroenterology, 146(5), 1176-1192.
  15. Choo, Q.L., et al. (1989). Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science, 244(4902), 359-362.
  16. Simmonds, P. (2013). The origin of hepatitis C virus, in Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy. Springer, (p. 1-15).
  17. Manns, M., Wedemeyer, H. & Cornberg, M. (2006). Treating viral hepatitis C: efficacy, side effects, and complications. Gut, 55(9), 1350-1359.
  18. Zein, N. N. (2000). Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 13(2), 223-235.
  19. Hamid, S., et al. (2004). PSG consensus statement on management of hepatitis C virus infection--2003. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 54(3), 146.
  20. Akhtar, S. & Rozi, S. (2009). An autoregressive integrated moving average model for short-term prediction of hepatitis C virus seropositivity among male volunteer blood donors in Karachi, Pakistan. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, 15(13), 1607.
  21. Sandoughdaran, S., Alavian, S. M., Sharafi, H., Behnava, B., Salimi, S., et al. (2015). Efficacy of Prolonged Treatment With Pegylated Interferon (Peg-IFN) and Ribavirin in Thalassemic Patients With Hepatitis C Who Relapsed After Previous Peg-IFN-Based Therapy. Hepatitis Monthly, 15(1).
  22. Sarwar, S., Khan, A. A. & Tarique, S. (2015). Response guided interferon therapy for genotype 3 of chronic hepatitis C: Compliance and outcome. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 31(4), 843.
  23. Batool, U. & Qureshi, S. (2006). Declining sustained virological response in hepatitis C. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan: JCPSP, 16(3), 187-191.
  24. Waheed, Y. (2015). Effect of interferon plus ribavirin therapy on hepatitis C virus genotype 3 patients from Pakistan: treatment response, side effects and future prospective. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 8(2), 85-89.
  25. Iqbal, S., Sheikh, M. A. & Arshad, M. (2014). Response of different HCV genotypes to interferon therapy in different age groups of chronic hepatitis-C patients. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 26(3), 310-315.
  26. Sarwar, S., Khan, A. A. & Tarique, S. (2011). Pegylated vs. standard interferon in combination with ribavirin for genotype 2 and 3 in chronic hepatitis C: 10 years experience in local population. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 17(2), 108-108.
  27. Niederau, C., et al. (2014). Predictive factors for sustained virological response after treatment with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in patients infected with HCV genotypes 2 and 3. PLoS One, 9(9), e107592.
  28. Tapper, E. & Afdhal, N. (2013). Is 3 the new 1: perspectives on virology, natural history and treatment for hepatitis C genotype 3. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 20(10), 669-677.
  29. Jaroszewicz, J., Flisiak, R. & Dusheiko, G. (2014). A pill for HCV-myth or foreseeable future? Liver International, 34(1), 6-11.
  30. Ampuero, J., Romero‐Gómez, M. & Reddy, K. (2014). HCV genotype 3-the new treatment challenge. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 39(7), 686-698.
  31. Ferenci, P. (2012). Response guided therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C-yesterday, today and tomorrow. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 26(4), 463-469.
  32. Fried, M. W., et al. (2011). Rapid virological response is the most important predictor of sustained virological response across genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Journal of Hepatology, 55(1), 69-75.
  33. Shiffman, M. L., et al. (2007). Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin for 16 or 24 Weeks in HCV. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(16), 1661-1662.
  34. Dalgard, O., et al. (2004). Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavarin in HCV infection with genotype 2 or 3 for 14 weeks: a pilot study. Hepatology, 40(6), 1260-1265.
  35. Hlaing, N. K. T., et al. (2016). Hepatitis C virus therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin in Myanmar: A resource-constrained country. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 22(43), 9613.

Total Articles Published

8
9
2


Total Citations:

1
8
4




Highlights


Cient Periodique is a ‘Gold’ open access publisher that aspires to offer absolute free, unrestricted access to the valuable research information

We welcome all the eminent authors to submit your valuable paper

Cient Periodique invites the participation of honourable Editors and Authors

CPQ Journals provide Certificates for publication

Cient Periodique also offers memberships for potential Authors

Best Articles will be appreciated with the provision of corresponding Certificate

Hi!

We're here to answer your questions!


Send us a message via Whatsapp, and we'll reply the moment we're available!